Home / Guides / Minervini and RPS (research note)

Minervini trend template and RPS (research note)

📅 Updated: 🕐 Reading time: about 9 min 📊 Research note · method boundaries · non-advice

⚡ Quick answer (Speakable)

The trend template is an umbrella label in Mark Minervini study materials for a structure checklist around price and moving averages. Stage 2 and VCP (Volatility Contraction Pattern) are likewise research/learning frameworks. This site’s multi-period RPS is a cross-sectional rank filter you can place beside them—not a buy signal and not a reproduction of the method.

🤖 Short summary (TL;DR)

This page does not implement the Minervini system. It is a short public-study summary + RPS side-by-side note. Record price structure / pattern observation and in-market percentiles as separate evidence. Thresholds are hypotheses—not entry instructions.

⚠️ Method boundaries (read first)

1. Positioning as research context

In growth / momentum study notes, O’Neil / CANSLIM often sits beside the Minervini trend template. What this site provides is not that full system, but same-market period relative price strength (RPS) as cross-sectional rank data.

Therefore this page is limited to two goals:

  1. Summarize publicly discussed concepts briefly and with boundaries
  2. Show how multi-period RPS can sit as a side-by-side filter in a research notebook

Vocabulary: Relative strength (RS) and RPS. CANSLIM context: CANSLIM strategy guide (research/learning only).

2. Trend template (summary)

In study materials, a “trend template” is usually explained as a bundle of price-structure checklist items (details vary by source), such as:

Templates are discussed as an observation framework, not a fixed machine pass/fail. This site does not offer an “official Minervini implementation” auto-check.

3. Stage 2 and VCP (summary)

Stage 2 (uptrend framing)

Drawing on Stan Weinstein-style stage analysis, cycles are often split into roughly four stages, with Stage 2 framed as the advancing phase. Minervini-related study notes also reference Stage 2 when biasing candidates toward advancing regimes.

Stage labels are often ex-post and subjective. Do not read RPS highs/lows directly as Stage numbers.

VCP (Volatility Contraction Pattern)

VCP is commonly described as a pattern where price ranges contract in stages. Study notes use it as a frame for observing supply/demand digestion before a directional move. Volume contraction, number of contractions, and base depth vary by commentary and chart.

Judging “VCP-like” is chart reading—RPS numbers alone cannot replace it.

4. Multi-period RPS as a side-by-side filter

Example research-notebook pairing (a way to record hypotheses—not a trading rule):

Observation layerWhat you look at (examples)Role of RPS
Price structureMA placement/slope, high-low relationsDo not replace (separate evidence)
PatternContractions, bases, volume changesDo not replace (separate evidence)
Cross-sectional rankRelative performance inside one marketRecord and narrow with period RPS

Details: How to read RPS20/50/90/120/250 and Japan RPS screening workflow.

5. Boundaries so it is not a buy signal

  1. RPS is historical cross-sectional rank — “was relatively strong,” not “buyable now.”
  2. Template fit ≠ entry — separate structure observation from order decisions.
  3. VCP-likeness ≠ confirmed breakout — pattern recognition invites hindsight bias.
  4. Thresholds are hypotheses — e.g. “RPS90≥80” is only one research-filter example.
  5. Fix market and observation date — Japan RPS ranks inside Japan; don’t mix markets.

For relative-strength vocabulary basics, return to Relative strength and RPS.

6. Frequently asked questions (FAQ)

Are the trend template and RPS the same?

No. The trend template is usually discussed as a checklist of price/MA structure conditions; RPS is a per-window in-market percentile. You can place them side by side, but neither replaces the other.

Does high RPS mean Stage 2?

No. High RPS only describes upper-band relative performance for that window. It does not mean Stage classification or all trend-template conditions are met.

How can I combine VCP and RPS?

One research-note example: observe chart structure (contractions, volume, etc.) and price structure as separate evidence, and use multi-period RPS only to help narrow a candidate pool. Do not replace a VCP buy idea with RPS alone.

Which RPS windows should I watch?

No single correct answer. For research, placing short (e.g. RPS20/50) beside medium/long (e.g. RPS120/250) and noting resonance/divergence is readable. Thresholds are hypotheses, not trading rules. Details: multi-period guide.

Does this site reproduce Minervini’s method?

No. This page is a summary of public study context plus a side-by-side note for the RPS cross-sectional metric. It does not reproduce or guarantee books, courses, or proprietary screen conditions.

Is this investment advice?

No. Educational and research commentary only. No single-name recommendations, timing instructions, or guarantees of future returns.

How does this relate to CANSLIM or relative strength?

Growth-stock study lineages often overlap on leadership and relative strength ideas. This site’s RPS can be a research cross-sectional filter, but it is not a substitute for CANSLIM or Minervini systems. Related: CANSLIM strategy guide, RS and RPS.

Research-screen with Japan RPS rankings

Sort TSE names by period relative price strength (RPS). Figures summarize past in-market ranks—not investment advice or trade recommendations.

Open Japan RPS rankings

Related pages

Open the multi-market RPS research tool

Full HK / US / Japan rankings are available on a membership plan. Review plan coverage first—no hard sell, no fake urgency.

View membership plans