Home › RPS Guide › Data Coverage Archive

RPS Four-Market Data Coverage Archive

This page publicly discloses the number of valid securities that can be computed for RPS50, the number of industry classifications, and the latest completion update times for each market. Here, the “valid samples” refers to the calculation scope, not equivalent to the total number of securities listed on the exchange.

Public Snapshot: 2026-09-24 · Total across four markets: 20,632 valid securities

5,212A-shares · 49 industry labels
8,948U.S. stocks · 48 industry labels
2,774Hong Kong stocks · 169 industry labels
3,698Japanese stocks · 33 industry labels

Current public coverage

MarketValid securitiesIndustry classificationDatabase completion update time
China A-shares5,212492026-09-24 11:08:28
US stocks8,948482026-09-25 13:40:38
Hong Kong stocks2,7741692026-09-25 12:58:24
Japanese stocks3,698332026-09-25 13:11:17
Total20,632Sample pool for four independently ranked markets

Valid samples are not the total listed securities

To enter a specific RPS window, a security must have sufficient historical trading day data and valid positive closing prices at the start and end of the window. New listings may first enter RPS20 and then gradually enter RPS50, RPS90, RPS120, and RPS250. Delistings, suspensions, code changes, or missing prices may temporarily exit the window.

Therefore, the quantities on this page explain the denominator for the current ranking, not the total number of listed securities on the exchange. When researchers cite RPS percentiles, they should retain the market, window, snapshot date, and number of valid samples simultaneously.

Why are the four markets ranked independently

China A-shares

Using the Shanghai and Shenzhen securities that meet the historical length and price quality requirements for the corresponding window as the comparison set. Price limit systems, trading halts, and industry classifications all have local characteristics.

US stocks

Larger number of securities, more frequent changes in listings and delistings. Short windows usually cover more new securities with shorter history, so the number of samples in different RPS windows may differ significantly.

Hong Kong stocks

Larger liquidity differentiation, ranking itself does not represent tradability. When viewing high RPS targets, additional verification of trading volume, bid-ask spreads, and company public information should be conducted.

Japanese stocks

Uses independent trading calendars and industry labels. Japanese stock RPS only reflects its relative position within the Japanese stock valid samples and cannot be directly converted to other currency markets.

How to use industry classifications

Industry labels are used to observe whether strong samples are concentrated in a few themes and whether the same direction repeats across periods. The number of industry labels changes due to label cleaning and completion of security classifications; labels are not ratings and do not mean that all securities within an industry have the same risk or return characteristics.

Data update times and revisions

Data for the four markets is completed by separate daily update processes, so completion times within the same day may differ. Public aggregated snapshots are generated after updates and distributed via JSON distribution addresspublication. If historical prices or classifications are revised, subsequent recalculations may change the valid samples and historical percentiles.

Recommended citation:“RPS Stock, 2026-09-24 completion snapshot, RPS50 valid samples 20,632 only; of which A-shares 5,212 U.S. stocks 8,948 Hong Kong stocks 2,774 Japanese stocks 3,698.” Please also attach the page URL and note that this statistic does not represent the total listed securities on the exchange.

Extended verification

RPS calculation methodology: Return formula, percentile ranking, and tie rulesPublic Data Directory: Downloadable JSON, Dataset metadata, and citation boundariesToday's Market Pulse: Current RPS50 strong sample diffusion situationWeekly Report Cross-Week Trends: Historical snapshots, dominant industries, and cycle differencesHistorical commentary cases: Observation dates, confirmation conditions, and failure conditionsResearch and editorial standards: Data, commentary, and correction processes

Page update: 2026-09-25; Current market data snapshot: 2026-09-24.